• Editors
  • Scope
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Artical Processing Charge
  • Instruction for Author
  • Principles and Policies of transparency
  • Policies of corrections and retractions
  • EndNote style

2018 (v.26 no.1)

Translational and Clinical Pharmacology

Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
ISSN: 2289-0882

  • A post hoc analysis of intra-subject coefficients of variation in pharmacokinetic measures to calculate optimal sample sizes for bioequivalence studies

    Inbum Chung, Jaeseong Oh, SeungHwan Lee, In-Jin Jang, Youngjo Lee, Jae-Yong Chung

    TCP | v.26, no.1, pp.06-09, Mar, 2018


    Because bioequivalence studies are performed using a crossover design, information on the intra-subject coefficient of variation (intra-CV) for pharmacokinetic measures is needed when determining the sample size. However, calculated intra-CVs based on bioequivalence results of identical generic drugs produce different estimates. In this study, we collected bioequivalence results using public resources from the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) and calculated the intra-CVs of various generics. For the generics with multiple bioequivalence results, pooled intra-CVs were calculated. The estimated intra-CVs of 142 bioequivalence studies were 14.7±8.2% for AUC and 21.7±8.8% for Cmax. Intra-CVs of Cmax were larger than those of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) in 129 studies (90.8%). For the 26 generics with multiple bioequivalence results, the coefficients of variation of intra-CVs between identical generics (mean±sd (min ~ max)) were 38.0±24.4% (1.9 ~ 105.3%) for AUC and 27.9±18.2% (4.0 ~ 70.1%) for Cmax. These results suggest that substantial variation exists among the bioequivalence results of identical generics. In this study, we presented the intra-CVs of various generics with their pooled intra-CVs. The estimated intra-CVs calculated in this study will provide useful information for planning future bioequivalence studies. (This is republication of the article 'Transl Clin Pharmacol 2017;25:179-182' retracted from critical typographic errors. See the 'Retraction and Republication section of this issue for further information)


    bioequivalence, coefficient of variation, sample size, power, generic drugs